184 Main Street

Medway, MA 02053

8 North Main Street

Attleboro, MA 02703

75 Second Avenue

Needham, MA 02494

Understanding Comparative Fault in Massachusetts Car Accident Cases

Being involved in a serious car accident can be a stressful and life-altering experience. When it comes to determining liability in car accident cases, Massachusetts follows a comparative fault system. Understanding how comparative fault works is crucial, as it can significantly impact the outcome of your personal injury claim.
In this article, we will provide you with a comprehensive overview of comparative fault in Massachusetts car accident cases, including what it means, how it’s calculated, and how it can affect your ability to recover compensation.
What is Comparative Fault?
Comparative fault, also known as comparative negligence, is a legal concept that comes into play when determining liability in personal injury cases, including car accidents. Massachusetts operates under a modified comparative fault system, specifically known as the 51% rule.
Under this rule, an injured party can still recover damages from the at-fault party, even if the injured party shares some degree of fault for the accident. However, there is a catch: the injured party’s degree of fault cannot exceed 50%. In other words, if you are found to be 51% or more at fault for the accident, you may be limited from recovering any compensation.
How Comparative Fault is Calculated
In Massachusetts, the process of calculating comparative fault can be complex. It involves a careful examination of the facts and evidence surrounding the accident. Here’s a simplified breakdown of how it works:
1. Investigation and Evidence Collection
To determine comparative fault, your personal injury lawyer and the opposing party’s legal team will investigate the accident thoroughly. This may include collecting witness statements, examining police reports, reviewing medical records, and consulting accident reconstruction experts if necessary.
2. Assigning Percentages of Fault
Once all the relevant evidence has been gathered, the parties involved will assign percentages of fault to each party involved in the accident. For example, if the court determines that the total damages amount to $100,000 and you are found to be 30% at fault, your potential compensation will be reduced by 30%, leaving you eligible for $70,000.
3. Jury Consideration
In some cases, the question of comparative fault may be decided by a jury. Jurors will listen to the evidence presented by both sides and make a determination of each party’s degree of fault. This underscores the importance of having skilled legal representation to present your case effectively.
Impact on Compensation
Understanding comparative fault is essential because it directly affects the amount of compensation you can recover in a car accident case. Massachusetts follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that even if you are partially at fault for the accident, you can still seek damages. However, the amount you can recover will be reduced proportionally to your degree of fault.
Strategies to Minimize Comparative Fault
To maximize your chances of recovering fair compensation in a Massachusetts car accident case, it’s essential to employ effective legal strategies to minimize your degree of fault. Here are some ways experienced personal injury lawyers can help:
Thorough Investigation
We will conduct a comprehensive investigation into the accident, collecting evidence and witness statements to build a strong case that demonstrates the other party’s greater degree of fault.
Expert Witnesses
We have access to accident reconstruction experts and other specialists who can provide testimony to support your claim and refute allegations of comparative fault.
Negotiation Skills
Our lawyers are skilled negotiators who can engage in settlement discussions with the opposing party’s insurance company to reach a favorable outcome.
Court Representation
If a fair settlement cannot be reached, we are prepared to litigate your case in court, presenting a compelling argument to demonstrate the other party’s greater responsibility for the accident.
Experienced Massachusetts Car Accident Injury Lawyers
Navigating the complexities of comparative fault in Massachusetts car accident cases can be challenging, but with the right legal representation, you can protect your rights and seek fair compensation. Our team of experienced car accident injury lawyers is dedicated to helping car accident victims understand their legal options and achieve the best possible outcomes.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a car accident, don’t hesitate to reach out to us for a free case evaluation. We are here to provide the guidance and advocacy you need to recover the compensation you deserve. Remember, in Massachusetts, understanding comparative fault is crucial to securing the compensation you need to move forward after a car accident.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Steven M. Houde

Steven M. Houde

Attorney Houde is a top rated personal injury lawyer serving the Greater Boston region. With law offices in Medway, Attelboro, Needham, and Wellesley, Massachusetts, he will travel to meet clients at their home, hospital, or work. He is skilled at handling all facets of a successful injury claim, from proving liability to looking into all possible sources of insurance coverage to dealing with insurers and defense counsel.

All Posts

Get a Case Evaluation

We are happy to provide a consultation to all first time clients. Please complete the form below and we will contact you.




    781-235-7744